Over the past year and a half there seems to be a growing shadow over the facts about the covid 19 virus and the delta variant. This darkening of reality is spreading from governments, Local, State and Federal and even world wide. The facts are out there if you look for them. No opinions, but science/medically based research and application. Yet the Governments are not responding to the research and facts concerning this virus.

First let me say I think when this virus first broke out, those in power with the knowledge understood it was man made and spreading really fast, and it scared the crap out of them. They took dramatic action is an abundance of caution. Rightfully so. But rather than be transparent about the source and statistics they darkened the facts with misleading information. The Main line Public media which is so inbreed with the federal government carried the misinformation willing.

Examples: 1. The first couple of months death caused by covid was reported. Numbers were low, for healthy individuals almost nonexistent. So they change the reporting and recording from caused to related….so anyone who died, say of lung cancer, but tested positive for covid was counted as a covid death. This was reenforced by paying hospitals more money for covid deaths than candy deaths. Not just cancer, every death for the past almost two years if they tested positive for covid was reported a covid caused! Not factual!

Please don’t misunderstand me, covid is real and bad I would not want to get it. But it is no more or less serious than a flu. It is no more deadly than the flu. I base this on the hospitalization and death rates in the past of flu outbreaks (you could find this on the CDC web site easily a year ago, now the information is much harder to find) compared to actual covid caused deaths rather than related deaths.

All this being said is to point out the current infringement on the civil rights of Americans is not really about covid. If it were the flood of illegals (hundreds of thousands) would be stopped. It is something altogether different.

Time to RESIST!!

Mask do not work! Below is the researched evidence from the CDC itself as well as two different other fact based researched findings.

Unite, through away your masked it is DEHUMANIZING AND INTENDED TO DIVIDE AND SEPARATE AS A CONTROL MECHANISM

PROOF MASKED DO NOT WORK:

Surgical Masks from the CDC 2019 article 64

“Surgical masks are not respirators. They are disposable coverings designed to be loose-fitting over the user’s nose and mouth. These loose-fitting masks leave gaps between the mask and the wearer’s face through which harmful particles may pass. Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not address the fit function of masks and surgical masks are not NIOSH approved, the mask may not be used in situations covered by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) within areas requiring the use of respiratory protection. Therefore surgical masks should never be used for protection against infectious aerosolized particles.”

References

Bessesen, M. T., Adams, J. C., Radonovich, L., & Anderson, J. (2015). Disinfection of reusable elastomeric respirators by health care workers: A feasibility study and development of standard operating procedures. American journal of infection control, 43(6), 629-634.

CDC-NIOSH January 20, 2012. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators /factsheets/respsars.html

CDC-NIOSH March 13, 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hcwcontrols/ recommendedguidanceextuse.html

CDC-NIOSH May 23, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/disp _part/n95list1.html

National Academy of Sciences (NAS), (2006). Reusability of facemasks during an influenza pandemic: Facing the flu. Committee on the development of reusable facemasks for use during influenza pandemic. National Academies Press: Washington, DC.

Peterson, K., Novak, D., Stradtman, L., Wilson, D., & Couzens, L. (2015). Hospital respiratory protection practices in 6 US states: A public health evaluation study. American journal of infection control, 43(1), 63-71.

————————